翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Doctrinaires ・ Doctrinal background of Zen ・ Doctrine ・ Doctrine (album) ・ Doctrine (PHP) ・ Doctrine and Covenants ・ Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce ・ Doctrine and Life ・ Doctrine Commission (Church of England) ・ Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations ・ Doctrine of Addai ・ Doctrine of bias in Singapore law ・ Doctrine of capacities ・ Doctrine of cash equivalence ・ Doctrine of chances ・ Doctrine of colourability ・ Doctrine of concurrent delay ・ Doctrine of Election ・ Doctrine of equivalents ・ Doctrine of Exchange ・ Doctrine of exoneration of liens ・ Doctrine of Father Divine ・ Doctrine of foreign equivalents ・ Doctrine of indivisibility ・ Doctrine of inherency ・ Doctrine of internal relations ・ Doctrine of Labyrinths ・ Doctrine of lapse ・ Doctrine of marshalling ・ Doctrine of necessity Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Doctrine of colourability ： ウィキペディア英語版 Doctrine of colourability The doctrine of colourability is the idea that when the legislature wants to do something that it cannot do within the constraints of the constitution, it colours the law with a substitute purpose which will still allow it to accomplish its original goal. ==India== Under the constitution of India 〔Book Titled "Land and the Constitution in India" has a chaters titled "Empire and Commonwealth Origins of the Doctrine of Colorability" page 209 and "Colorability" and Zamindari Abolition Laws" page 211〕 exclusive jurisdiction for the Union and the State has been conferred regarding subject matters of legislation. This has been provided by Article 246 which has demarcated the legislative jurisdiction of the parliament and the state assemblies by outlining the different subjects under List I for the Union, List II for the State and List III for both, as given in the seventh schedule to the Indian Constitution. As a consequence the conflicts of jurisdiction arise, due to the very fact that we have separate lists for the Union and the State to legislate upon. It often happens that the strict constitutional boundaries are transgressed in legislation inviting judicial review of the said Bill/Act. The enactment of legislation is a function of the legislative power. In order to decide whether a particular legislation is unconstitutional for offending the constitutional limitations of distribution of powers, the Court examines the enactment with some strictness. The Legislature can only make laws within its legislative competence. The legislative competence may be limited by specific List entries, or be restricted by other constitutional limitations and prohibitions. It cannot over-step the area of its legislative capability. A simple rule is followed in this regard which is to find out if the legislating body had the power to legislate directly. If it is not so, then the legislature cannot hide its incompetence by purporting to legislate indirectly. What it cannot do directly, it cannot attempt to do indirectly. Therefore, the substance of the legislation must be articulated for the purpose of determining whether what it is enacted, it can really do. The question of colourable legislation was fully discussed by the Supreme Court in K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v. Orissa, a decision which has been treated as settling the law on the subject which was further approved in the Supreme Court decision of Sonapur Tea Co. v. Deputy Commissioner. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Doctrine of colourability」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.